Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Priester v. State

Priester v. State

955 So. 2d 644, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 6613, 2007 WL 1261484
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 2, 2007
DocketNo. 4D07-1083
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 955 So. 2d 644 (Priester v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Priester v. State, 955 So. 2d 644, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 6613, 2007 WL 1261484 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order denying Appellant’s emergency motions for reclarification of sentence is affirmed, without prejudice to his right to exhaust all administrative remedies with the Department of Corrections. If the department fails to implement the earlier orders clarifying and amending his sentences, he may then seek mandamus relief against the Department of Corrections in the circuit court. See Davis v. State, 943 So.2d 975 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006); Smith v. State, 785 So.2d 1237 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).

STONE, FARMER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. McDonough
955 So. 2d 644 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
955 So. 2d 644, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 6613, 2007 WL 1261484, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/priester-v-state-fladistctapp-2007.