Priester v. State

933 So. 2d 665, 2006 WL 1896324
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 12, 2006·No. 4D05-4577·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

933 So.2d 665 (2006)

Willie PRIESTER, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D05-4577.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 12, 2006.

Willie Priester, Okeechobee, pro se.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and David M. Schultz, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The order denying appellant's motion to correct illegal sentence is affirmed, without prejudice to appellant's right to seek clarification of his sentence in the trial court in accordance with the state's acknowledgement that, by scrivener's error, the phrase "consecutively with each other" was not deleted from the commitment form.

STEVENSON, C.J., STONE and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Priester v. State, 933 So. 2d 665, 2006 WL 1896324 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

933 So. 2d 665 (Priester v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williamson v. DEPT. OF HIGHWAY SAFETY
933 So. 2d 665 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)