Priester v. State
This text of 933 So. 2d 665 (Priester v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Willie PRIESTER, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Willie Priester, Okeechobee, pro se.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and David M. Schultz, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The order denying appellant's motion to correct illegal sentence is affirmed, without prejudice to appellant's right to seek clarification of his sentence in the trial court in accordance with the state's acknowledgement that, by scrivener's error, the phrase "consecutively with each other" was not deleted from the commitment form.
STEVENSON, C.J., STONE and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
933 So. 2d 665, 2006 WL 1896324, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/priester-v-state-fladistctapp-2006.