Priceman v. City of New York

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Priceman v. City of New York

199 Misc. 737, 106 N.Y.S.2d 916, 1951 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2255

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedMay 10, 1951

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 199 Misc. 737 (Priceman v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Priceman v. City of New York, 199 Misc. 737, 106 N.Y.S.2d 916, 1951 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2255 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1951).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The City Court of the City of New York has no jurisdiction to entertain an application for leave to serve a late notice of claim upon the City of New York (Meier v. City of New York, 199 Misc. 305). Failure to comply with the requirements of section 50-e of the General Municipal Law nullifies the judgment recovered by the infant plaintiff. (See Chavers v. City of Mount Vernon, 301 N. Y. 634.)

[738]*738The order, so far as appealed from, should he unanimously reversed upon the law, without costs, and motion denied, without costs; the judgment should he unanimously reversed upon the law, without costs, and complaint dismissed, without costs.

Fennelly, Beldock and Walsh, JJ., concur.

Order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI