Pandolfi v. Board of Education

9 Misc. 2d 305, 164 N.Y.S.2d 595, 1957 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2790
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided June 27, 1957·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The court lacked jurisdiction to entertain plaintiff’s motion to validate the notice of claim served more than one year after the causes of action arose (Matter of Martin v. School Bd. [Long Beach], 301 N. Y. 233). An application for leave to serve a late notice of claim may be made only in the County Court or Supreme Court in the county where an action on the claim could properly be brought for trial (Meier v. City of New York, 199 Misc. 305; Priceman v. City of New York, 199 Misc. 737). The holding of a hearing by the comptroller on plaintiff’s claim against the City of New York did not constitute a waiver of the rights of the Board of Education (Matter of Fabricant v. City of New York, 273 App. Div. 975, affd. 298 N. Y. 818).

The order should be reversed, with $10 costs, and motion denied.

Hecht, Aubelio and Tilzeb, JJ., concur.

Order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pandolfi v. Board of Education, 9 Misc. 2d 305, 164 N.Y.S.2d 595, 1957 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2790 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1957).

9 Misc. 2d 305 (Pandolfi v. Board of Education) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Fabricant v. City of New York
83 N.E.2d 862 (New York Court of Appeals, 1949)
Fabricant v. City of New York
273 A.D. 975 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1948)
Meier v. City of New York
199 Misc. 305 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1951)
Priceman v. City of New York
199 Misc. 737 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1951)
Martin v. School Board of Union Free District No. 28
93 N.E.2d 655 (New York Court of Appeals, 1950)