Price v. State

266 S.W.3d 343, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1424, 2008 WL 4634930
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 21, 2008
DocketED 90634
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 266 S.W.3d 343 (Price v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Price v. State, 266 S.W.3d 343, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1424, 2008 WL 4634930 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Rickey Price (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035 without an evidentiary hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Sutherland
266 S.W.3d 343 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
266 S.W.3d 343, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1424, 2008 WL 4634930, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/price-v-state-moctapp-2008.