Price v. State

266 S.W.3d 343, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1424, 2008 WL 4634930
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 21, 2008·No. ED 90634·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Rickey Price (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035 without an evidentiary hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Price v. State, 266 S.W.3d 343, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1424, 2008 WL 4634930 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

266 S.W.3d 343 (Price v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Sutherland
266 S.W.3d 343 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)