Price v. State

233 S.W.3d 763, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1296, 2007 WL 2768700
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 25, 2007·No. ED 88615·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Cornell Price, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, movant argues that his counsel coerced him into pleading guilty because he could not afford to pay counsel’s fees for a trial.

The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Price v. State, 233 S.W.3d 763, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1296, 2007 WL 2768700 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

233 S.W.3d 763 (Price v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

KISTER v. Travis
233 S.W.3d 763 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)