Price v. State

798 So. 2d 49, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 14702, 2001 WL 1230929
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 17, 2001·No. No. 4D01-3029·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order summarily denying Appellant’s rule 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence, which sought to increase the credit for jail time served, is affirmed without prejudice to Appellant’s seeking additional credit by filing a properly pleaded rule 3.800(a) motion that alleges where in the record the information can be located and explains how the record demonstrates entitlement to the relief requested. See Skullestad v. State, 790 So.2d 516 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); Toro v. State, 719 So.2d 947, 948 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). Appellant is out of time for filing a rule 3.850 motion. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(b).

FARMER, STEVENSON, TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Price v. State, 798 So. 2d 49, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 14702, 2001 WL 1230929 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

798 So. 2d 49 (Price v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bynes v. State
798 So. 2d 49 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)