Price v. State

717 So. 2d 1123, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 12420, 1998 WL 673168
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 2, 1998·No. No. 98-2399·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER C.URIAM.

We affirm the lower court’s denial of the defendant’s most recent post-conviction motion. This is the defendant’s fourth post-conviction motion and seventh appeal or petition to this court concerning his convictions and sentences in Case Nos. 91-13277, 90-20372, 89-10102, 89-16268, 89-16794. Enough is enough. The defendant is prohibited from filing any further pro se pleadings with this court concerning his convictions and sentences in Case Nos. 91-13277, 90-20372, 89-10102, 89-16268, 89-16794. As this court did in Hendrix v. State, 712 So.2d 778 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998); Davis v. State, 705 So.2d 133 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998); Rooney v. State, 699 So.2d 1027 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997) and O’Brien v. State, 689 So.2d 336 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. denied, 697 So.2d 511 (Fla.1997), the defendant is warned of the consequences of persisting.

AFFIRMED.

W. SHARP, GOSHORN and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Price v. State, 717 So. 2d 1123, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 12420, 1998 WL 673168 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

717 So. 2d 1123 (Price v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Henriquez v. State
791 So. 2d 2 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Price v. State
744 So. 2d 560 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)