Price v. Hosterman Lumber Co.

73 S.E. 55, 70 W. Va. 12, 1911 W. Va. LEXIS 182
West Virginia Supreme Court·Decided November 28, 1911·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinions

Millee, Judge:

The point of the syllabus is fairfy supported by our case of Williams v. Overholt, 46 W. Va. 340; but more particularly by Merrill v. National Bank, 173 U. S. 136; Aldrich v. Chemical National Bank, 176 U. S. 639; Bank v. Armstrong, 59 Fed. 380, 8 C. C. A. 163; Bank v. Williamette, &c Co., 80 Fed. 227; Doe v. N. W. Coal & Transp. Co., 78 Fed. 72; Central Trust Co. v. [13]*13Richmond, &c. Co., 68 Fed. 99; Bank v. Trigg, 106 Va. 327, 56 S. E. 158.

Applying this rule of these cases to the case at bar the decree below, appealed from, in so far as it deprives the appellant Uriah Hevener, a vendor creditor, and a general creditor, of his right to share in the distribution of general fund belonging to the debtor’s estate, on the basis of the entire debt proven and decreed in his favor, including his debt for purchase money, must be reversed, and corrected in accordance with the rule promulgated in the syllabus.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Price v. Hosterman Lumber Co., 73 S.E. 55, 70 W. Va. 12, 1911 W. Va. LEXIS 182 (W. Va. 1911).

73 S.E. 55 (Price v. Hosterman Lumber Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Whitesel v. Harman
161 S.E. 15 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1931)
Estate of Prescott State Bank
3 P.2d 788 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1931)
First Nat. Bank v. Green
128 So. 394 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1930)
State Ex Rel. Rankin v. Yellowstone Bank & Trust Co.
243 P. 813 (Montana Supreme Court, 1925)