Price Simms Holdings LLC v. Candle3, LLC
Opinion
PRICE SIMMS HOLDINGS, LLC, et al., No. 2:18-cv-1851-WBS-KJN Plaintiffs, ORDER v. (ECF Nos. 141, 149.) CANDLE3, LLC, Defendant. On May 11, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF No. 149), which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within seven (7) days. No objections were filed. Accordingly, the court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the findings and recommendations in full. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 149) are ADOPTED IN FULL; 2. Plaintiffs’ Motion for Attorney’s Fees (ECF No. 141) is GRANTED IN PART; 3. Plaintiffs’ are awarded attorney’s fees in the amount of $159,665. Dated: May 19, 2021 a hha hh. WILLIAM B. SHUBB UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ll
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Price Simms Holdings LLC v. Candle3, LLC (Price Simms Holdings LLC v. Candle3, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.