Price Simms Holdings LLC v. Candle3, LLC

District Court, E.D. California·Decided April 28, 2021·No. 2:18-cv-01851·Unknown

Opinion

PRICE SIMMS HOLDINGS, LLC, et al., No. 2:18-cv-1851-WBS-KJN Plaintiffs, ORDER v. (ECF Nos. 130, 140, 141) CANDLE3, LLC, Defendant. On April 6, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF No. 140), which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. No objections were filed. Accordingly, the court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the findings and recommendations in full. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 140) are ADOPTED IN FULL; 2. Plaintiffs’ Motion for Default Judgment (ECF No. 130) is GRANTED; 3. Plaintiffs are awarded final judgment in the amount of $3,340,256; and 4. Candle3’s counterclaims (ECF No. 59) are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute. Dated: April 27, 2021 /, td ak. 2 □ WILLIAMB.SHUBB —i(i‘“CSCs—s—S UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Price Simms Holdings LLC v. Candle3, LLC, (E.D. Cal. 2021).

Price Simms Holdings LLC v. Candle3, LLC (Price Simms Holdings LLC v. Candle3, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Donald Milton Orand v. United States
602 F.2d 207 (Ninth Circuit, 1979)