Pribble v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, S.D. Illinois·Decided January 7, 2025·No. 3:22-cv-02430·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

TYLAR J. P., ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Case No. 3:22-cv-02430-GCS ) COMMISSIONER of SOCIAL ) SECURITY, ) ) ) Defendant. )

ORDER for ATTORNEY’S FEES SISON, Magistrate Judge: This matter comes before the Court on the parties’ application for attorney’s fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. (Doc. 38). Defendant does not oppose the amount of the fee requested. Id. Based on the pleadings, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff is awarded $10,900.00 for attorney’s fees and expenses in full satisfaction of any and all claims for attorney’s fees and expenses that may be payable to Plaintiff in this matter under the EAJA. Any fees paid belong to Plaintiff and not Plaintiff’s attorney and can be offset to satisfy any pre-existing debt that the litigant owes the United States per Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010). If Defendant can verify that Plaintiff does not owe a pre-existing debt to the government subject to the offset, Defendant will direct that the award be made payable to Plaintiff's attorney, Cody Marvin, pursuant to the EAJA assignment duly signed by Plaintiff and counsel. If payment is mailed, as compared to electronically deposited, it shall be mailed to counsel’s address of record: Cody Marvin - Marvin & Marvin Associates, P.C. 630 Davis Street, Suite 300 Evanston, IL 60201

IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: January 7, 2025. Digitally signed by G | | bert C Gilbert C Sison S son Date: 2025.01.07 11:53:17 -06'00' GILBERT C. SISON United States Magistrate Judge

Page 2 of 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pribble v. Commissioner of Social Security, (S.D. Ill. 2025).

Pribble v. Commissioner of Social Security (Pribble v. Commissioner of Social Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Astrue v. Ratliff
560 U.S. 586 (Supreme Court, 2010)