Preston v. Thompson
285 S.E.2d 833
Opinion
Helen C. PRESTON
v.
Benjamin E. THOMPSON.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Billings, Burns & Wells, Winston-Salem, for plaintiff.
Petree, Stockton, Robinson, Vaughn, Glaze & Maready, Winston-Salem, for defendant.
Plaintiff's notice of appeal and petition for discretionary review under G.S. § 7A-31, 280 S.E.2d 780. Defendant's motion to *834 dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question. Allowed.
Petition denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Preston v. Thompson, 285 S.E.2d 833 (N.C. 1981).
285 S.E.2d 833 (Preston v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Preston v. Thompson
280 S.E.2d 780 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1981)