Preston v. Thompson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Preston v. Thompson

285 S.E.2d 833

DecidedNovember 3, 1981

StatusPublished

This text of 285 S.E.2d 833 (Preston v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Preston v. Thompson, 285 S.E.2d 833 (N.C. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

285 S.E.2d 833 (1981)

Helen C. PRESTON
v.
Benjamin E. THOMPSON.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 3, 1981.

Billings, Burns & Wells, Winston-Salem, for plaintiff.

Petree, Stockton, Robinson, Vaughn, Glaze & Maready, Winston-Salem, for defendant.

Plaintiff's notice of appeal and petition for discretionary review under G.S. § 7A-31, 280 S.E.2d 780. Defendant's motion to *834 dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question. Allowed.

Petition denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

285 S.E.2d 833 (1981)

Helen C. PRESTON
v.
Benjamin E. THOMPSON.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 3, 1981.

Billings, Burns & Wells, Winston-Salem, for plaintiff.

Petree, Stockton, Robinson, Vaughn, Glaze & Maready, Winston-Salem, for defendant.

Plaintiff's notice of appeal and petition for discretionary review under G.S. § 7A-31, 280 S.E.2d 780. Defendant's motion to *834 dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question. Allowed.

Petition denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

285 S.E.2d 833, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/preston-v-thompson-nc-1981.

Opinion

Helen C. PRESTON v. Benjamin E. THOMPSON.

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Helen C. PRESTON
v.
Benjamin E. THOMPSON.