Preston v. Arthur
Opinion
This action was tried before the same referee and at the same time as actions Nos. 2 and 3, opinions wherein are herewith handed down (105 N. Y. Supp. 33, 36) and presented the same general features; the mortgage being foreclosed being upon a house adjacent to the two covered by the former actions.
In this case the referee excluded all the documentary evidence and made similar findings to those considered in the two prior cases, including the finding as to the appointment and1 qualification of Preston as receiver, the evidence to establish which he had excluded.
This judgment must also be reversed, and a new trial ordered before another referee, with costs to .the appellant to abide the event. All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
105 N.Y.S. 37 (Preston v. Arthur) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.