Preston v. Arthur
This text of 120 A.D. 94 (Preston v. Arthur) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This action was tried before the same refere'e and at the same time as actions Nos. 2 and 3
In this case the referee excluded all the documentary evidence and made similar findings to those considered in the two prior cases, including the finding as to the appointment and qualification of ■ Preston as receiver, the evidence to establish which he had excluded.
This judgment must also be reversed and a new trial ordered before another referee, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.
Ingba-ham, Lahghlin, Scott and Lambert, JJ., concurred.
Judgment reversed, new trial ordered before another referee, costs to appellant to abide event. Settle order on notice.
Preston v. Albee, No. 2 (120 App. Div. 89); Preston v. Arthur, No. 3 (Id. 93)—[Rep.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
120 A.D. 94, 105 N.Y.S. 37, 1907 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1122, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/preston-v-arthur-nyappdiv-1907.