Press-On, Inc. v. Goodman

New York Court of Appeals

Press-On, Inc. v. Goodman

55 N.E.2d 856, 293 N.Y. 36, 1944 N.Y. LEXIS 1344

New York Court of Appeals·Decided May 25, 1944·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

As this case comes to us, there is in it neither proof nor finding of any palming off, substitution, deception, simulation of package or trademark, misappropriation of literary property, illegal use of trade slogans, or of any other wrongdoing of a Mnd which is actionable as /-amounting to “ unfair competition ”.

*39 The judgment of the Appellate Division should he reversed and that of Special Term affirmed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division. (See 293 N. Y. 748.)

Lehman, Oh. J., Loughran, Lewis, Conway, Desmond and Thacher, JJ., concur; Rippey, J., taking no part.

Judgment accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

As this case comes to us, there is in it neither proof nor finding of any palming off, substitution, deception, simulation of package or trademark, misappropriation of literary property, illegal use of trade slogans, or of any other wrongdoing of a Mnd which is actionable as /-amounting to “ unfair competition ”.

*39 The judgment of the Appellate Division should he reversed and that of Special Term affirmed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division. (See 293 N. Y. 748.)

Lehman, Oh. J., Loughran, Lewis, Conway, Desmond and Thacher, JJ., concur; Rippey, J., taking no part.

Judgment accordingly.

Press-On, Inc. v. Goodman, 55 N.E.2d 856, 293 N.Y. 36, 1944 N.Y. LEXIS 1344 (N.Y. 1944).

Pincite

55 N.E.2d 856 (Press-On, Inc. v. Goodman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related