President of the Manhattan Co. v. Parker

258 A.D. 737, 14 N.Y.S.2d 906, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6706
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 16, 1939·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In an action for rent under a renewed lease, order denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. The judgment in the prior action between the same parties (President and Directors of Manhattan Co. v. Parker, 250 App. Div. 784) is res judicata and, therefore, defendant is estopped from attacking the validity of the renewal of the lease on the ground of fraud. (Schuylkill Fuel Cory. v. Nieberg Realty Corp., 250 N. Y. 304.) Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

President of the Manhattan Co. v. Parker, 258 A.D. 737, 14 N.Y.S.2d 906, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6706 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

258 A.D. 737 (President of the Manhattan Co. v. Parker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ripley v. Storer
132 N.E.2d 87 (New York Court of Appeals, 1956)