President of the Manhattan Co. v. Parker
This text of 258 A.D. 737 (President of the Manhattan Co. v. Parker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action for rent under a renewed lease, order denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. The judgment in the prior action between the same parties (President and Directors of Manhattan Co. v. Parker, 250 App. Div. 784) is res judicata and, therefore, defendant is estopped from attacking the validity of the renewal of the lease on the ground of fraud. (Schuylkill Fuel Cory. v. Nieberg Realty Corp., 250 N. Y. 304.) Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
258 A.D. 737, 14 N.Y.S.2d 906, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6706, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/president-of-the-manhattan-co-v-parker-nyappdiv-1939.