President of the Delaware v. Sansom

1 Binn. 70, 1803 Pa. LEXIS 18
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided December 21, 1803·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

[75] The opinion of the court was delivered by

Yeates J.

The court have no difficulty in this case. The terms of subscription must no doubt be taken with the act at large, but there is nothing in the act to annul the unconditional and express promise demanded by the first section. The power given to the compariyby the tenth section is merely discretionary; the penalty is in favour of the company, it is intended to enforce the payment of the subscription, and they may waive it as they have done in this case. As to the original shares then, there. must be judgment for the plaintiffs for the sum remaining due, with interest at six per cent.

The shares which the defendant holds as transferee stand on a different ground; as to them he has given no express promise to pay, and the act has made no other provision than that tile `~thare~ should be subject to the payments.

SHIPPEN C. J. was not present at the argument.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

President of the Delaware v. Sansom, 1 Binn. 70, 1803 Pa. LEXIS 18 (Pa. 1803).

1 Binn. 70 (President of the Delaware v. Sansom) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gordon v. Northern Trust Co.
183 A. 352 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1935)
Bell's Appeal
8 A. 177 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1887)
Wilbur v. Stockholders
29 F. Cas. 1189 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1878)
Webster v. Upton
91 U.S. 65 (Supreme Court, 1876)
Franks Oil Co. v. McCleary
63 Pa. 317 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1870)
Merrimac Mining Co. v. Levy
54 Pa. 227 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1867)
Palmer v. Ridge Mining Co.
34 Pa. 288 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1859)
Fort Edward & Fort Miller Plank Road Co. v. Payne
17 Barb. 567 (New York Supreme Court, 1854)
Northern Railroad v. Miller
10 Barb. 260 (New York Supreme Court, 1851)
Kennebec & Portland Rail Road v. Kendall
31 Me. 470 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1850)
Hartford & New-Haven Rail Road v. Kennedy
12 Conn. 499 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1838)
President of Hibernia Turnpike Road v. Henderson
8 Serg. & Rawle 219 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1822)
Taunton & South Boston Turnpike Corp. v. Whiting
10 Mass. 327 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1813)