Home/Supreme Court of Connecticut/Prescott v. City of Meriden

Prescott v. City of Meriden

845 A.2d 405, 268 Conn. 901, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 70
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedFebruary 18, 2004
DocketSC 17134
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 845 A.2d 405 (Prescott v. City of Meriden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Prescott v. City of Meriden, 845 A.2d 405, 268 Conn. 901, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 70 (Colo. 2004).

Opinion

The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 80 Conn. App. 697 (AC 23556), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the named plaintiff did not fall within the ‘imminent harm to an identifiable person’ exception to qualified immunity of a municipal employee?”

[902]*902Decided February 18, 2004 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17134. Lori Welch-Rubin and David Johnson, in support of the petition. Jay T. DonFrancisco, in opposition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Prescott v. City of Meriden
873 A.2d 175 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
845 A.2d 405, 268 Conn. 901, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 70, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prescott-v-city-of-meriden-conn-2004.