Prescott v. City of Meriden

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Prescott v. City of Meriden

845 A.2d 405, 268 Conn. 901, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 70

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided February 18, 2004·No. SC 17134·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 80 Conn. App. 697 (AC 23556), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the named plaintiff did not fall within the ‘imminent harm to an identifiable person’ exception to qualified immunity of a municipal employee?”

[902]*902Decided February 18, 2004 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17134. Lori Welch-Rubin and David Johnson, in support of the petition. Jay T. DonFrancisco, in opposition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 80 Conn. App. 697 (AC 23556), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the named plaintiff did not fall within the ‘imminent harm to an identifiable person’ exception to qualified immunity of a municipal employee?”

[902]*902Decided February 18, 2004 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17134. Lori Welch-Rubin and David Johnson, in support of the petition. Jay T. DonFrancisco, in opposition.

Prescott v. City of Meriden, 845 A.2d 405, 268 Conn. 901, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 70 (Colo. 2004).

Pincite

845 A.2d 405 (Prescott v. City of Meriden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related