Prentiss v. American University Wrather v. American University

214 F.2d 282
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedJuly 21, 1954
Docket11942, 11943
StatusPublished
Cited by19 cases

This text of 214 F.2d 282 (Prentiss v. American University Wrather v. American University) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Prentiss v. American University Wrather v. American University, 214 F.2d 282 (D.C. Cir. 1954).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

An order of the Zoning Commission of the District of Columbia rezonod the campus of The American University from residential “A” to residential “A restricted”. The immediate effect of the order was to prevent the building on the campus of a hospital to be maintained in connection with a School of Nursing.

*283 “The governmental power to interfere by zoning regulations with the general rights of the land owner by restricting the character of his use, is not unlimited, and. other questions aside, such restriction cannot be imposed if it does not bear a substantial relation to the public health,, safety, morals, or general welfare.” Nectow v. Cambridge, 277 U.S. 183, 188, 48 S.Ct. 447, 448, 72 L.Ed. 842. In the District Court, Judge Holtzoff found that the restriction which the rezoning order would impose on the University’s right to use its land did not meet this requirement. He therefore found the order unconstitutional, and set it aside, as taking the University’s property without due process of law. 1 D.C., 113 F.Supp. 389. We think he was clearly right. The judgment of the District Court is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dupont Circle Citizen's Ass'n v. District of Columbia Zoning Commission
343 A.2d 296 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1975)
Lowe v. City of Missoula
525 P.2d 551 (Montana Supreme Court, 1974)
Ruppert v. Washington
366 F. Supp. 686 (District of Columbia, 1973)
Ford v. Baltimore County
300 A.2d 204 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1973)
Citizens Ass'n of Georgetown, Inc. v. Washington
291 A.2d 699 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1972)
Capitol Hill Restoration Society v. Zoning Commission
287 A.2d 101 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1972)
S. Jon Gerstenfeld v. T. Sutton Jett
374 F.2d 333 (D.C. Circuit, 1967)
Donovan v. Clarke
223 F. Supp. 795 (District of Columbia, 1963)
White v. City of Twin Falls
338 P.2d 778 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1959)
Bilbar Construction Co. v. Easttown Township Board of Adjustment
393 Pa. 62 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1958)
O'BOYLE v. Coe
155 F. Supp. 581 (District of Columbia, 1957)
United States ex rel. Leon v. Shaughnessy
143 F. Supp. 270 (S.D. New York, 1956)
Ruben v. City of Pittsburgh
142 F. Supp. 787 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
214 F.2d 282, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prentiss-v-american-university-wrather-v-american-university-cadc-1954.