Premier Bank v. Tierney

Eighth Circuit

Premier Bank v. Tierney

155 F.3d 1045, 1998 WL 678340

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided October 2, 1998·No. No. 97-4363WM·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an action for negligence against directors, accountants, and attorneys for a group of companies known as the Midwestern Companies. The plaintiffs are the owners of certain industrial revenue bonds and coupons sold by certain municipalities and guaranteed by the Midwestern Companies. The District Court¹ held that the action was barred by the statute of limitations, Mo. Ann. Stat. § 516.100, and dismissed the complaint as to eight of the ten named defendants.. The Court later entered judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b), thus making its decision appealable.

[1046]*1046We affirm. We have nothing of substance to add to the well-reasoned opinion of the District Court.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an action for negligence against directors, accountants, and attorneys for a group of companies known as the Midwestern Companies. The plaintiffs are the owners of certain industrial revenue bonds and coupons sold by certain municipalities and guaranteed by the Midwestern Companies. The District Court¹ held that the action was barred by the statute of limitations, Mo. Ann. Stat. § 516.100, and dismissed the complaint as to eight of the ten named defendants.. The Court later entered judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b), thus making its decision appealable.

[1046]*1046We affirm. We have nothing of substance to add to the well-reasoned opinion of the District Court.

Affirmed.

Premier Bank v. Tierney, 155 F.3d 1045, 1998 WL 678340 (8th Cir. 1998).

Pincite

155 F.3d 1045 (Premier Bank v. Tierney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related