Premier Bank v. Tierney
This text of 155 F.3d 1045 (Premier Bank v. Tierney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PREMIER BANK and Sunwest Bank of Clovis, N.A., Appellants,
v.
Thomas W. TIERNEY, Tierney & Ernst, KMPG Peat, Marwick,
Wright, Herfordt & Sanders, Harold E. Card, Carl
E. Wright, Ira W. Palmer, and John P.
Redd, Appellees.
No. 97-4363WM.
United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 21, 1998.
Decided Oct. 2, 1998.
Michael P. Healey, Kansas City, MO, argued, for Appellants.
Robert S. Clark, Salt Lake City, UT, argued, for Appellees.
Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, BEAM, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
This is an action for negligence against directors, accountants, and attorneys for a group of companies known as the Midwestern Companies. The plaintiffs are the owners of certain industrial revenue bonds and coupons sold by certain municipalities and guaranteed by the Midwestern Companies. The District Court1 held that the action was barred by the statute of limitations, Mo. Ann. Stat. § 516.100, and dismissed the complaint as to eight of the ten named defendants. The Court later entered judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b), thus making its decision appealable.
We affirm. We have nothing of substance to add to the well-reasoned opinion of the District Court.
Affirmed.
The Hon. Howard F. Sachs, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
155 F.3d 1045, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 24530, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/premier-bank-v-tierney-ca8-1998.