Pratt v. Sparkman
44 N.W. 663, 42 Minn. 448, 1890 Minn. LEXIS 58
This text of 44 N.W. 663 (Pratt v. Sparkman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Pratt v. Sparkman, 44 N.W. 663, 42 Minn. 448, 1890 Minn. LEXIS 58 (Mich. 1890).
Opinion
It is evident that the part of the answer demurred to was not stated as in and of itself a defence, but that it was alleged as a part of the transaction set forth just preceding it, and not demurred.to. The fact that what precedes it is in one paragraph, and this matter in another, does not make it appear to have been set forth as an independent defence. • '
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Alansky v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.
28 N.W.2d 181 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1947)
State v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.
25 N.W.2d 294 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1946)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
44 N.W. 663, 42 Minn. 448, 1890 Minn. LEXIS 58, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pratt-v-sparkman-minn-1890.