Pratt v. Minn. Tex Investments & APCapital Group
708 N.W.2d 496, 2006 Minn. LEXIS 16, 2006 WL 133978
Opinion
ORDER
Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation
Court of Appeals filed September 19, 2005, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (summary dispositions have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).
BY THE COURT:
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pratt v. Minn. Tex Investments & APCapital Group, 708 N.W.2d 496, 2006 Minn. LEXIS 16, 2006 WL 133978 (Mich. 2006).
708 N.W.2d 496 (Pratt v. Minn. Tex Investments & APCapital Group) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.
708 N.W.2d 496 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 2006)