Home/Supreme Court of Minnesota/Pratt v. Minn. Tex Investments & APCapital Group

Pratt v. Minn. Tex Investments & APCapital Group

708 N.W.2d 496, 2006 Minn. LEXIS 16, 2006 WL 133978
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedJanuary 17, 2006
DocketA05-2044
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 708 N.W.2d 496 (Pratt v. Minn. Tex Investments & APCapital Group) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pratt v. Minn. Tex Investments & APCapital Group, 708 N.W.2d 496, 2006 Minn. LEXIS 16, 2006 WL 133978 (Mich. 2006).

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation

Court of Appeals filed September 19, 2005, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (summary dispositions have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

BY THE COURT:

/s/Sam Hanson Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.
708 N.W.2d 496 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
708 N.W.2d 496, 2006 Minn. LEXIS 16, 2006 WL 133978, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pratt-v-minn-tex-investments-apcapital-group-minn-2006.