Prather v. Brigano
716 N.E.2d 197, 86 Ohio St. 3d 609
Opinion
The court of appeals did not err in dismissing Prather’s habeas corpus petition. Prather’s speedy-trial claim is not cognizable in habeas corpus. State ex rel. Brantley v. Ghee (1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 287, 288, 685 N.E.2d 1243, 1244. In addition, Prather did not attach his commitment papers to his petition. Tucker v. McAninch (1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 423, 696 N.E.2d 595, 596. Based on the foregoing, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Prather v. Brigano, 716 N.E.2d 197, 86 Ohio St. 3d 609 (Ohio 1999).
716 N.E.2d 197 (Prather v. Brigano) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hopkins v. State, 89647 (4-16-2007)
2007 Ohio 1855 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2007)
In Re Peterson, 07-Ma-56 (4-5-2007)
2007 Ohio 1683 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2007)
Clarke v. McFaul, 89436 (4-5-2007)
2007 Ohio 1592 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2007)
State Ex Rel. Irvin v. Off. of Pros. Atty, Unpublished Decision (12-21-2005)
2005 Ohio 6975 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2005)
Moore v. Kochevar, Unpublished Decision (5-25-2004)
2004 Ohio 2687 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2004)
Palmer v. Rose, Unpublished Decision (3-10-2003)
Ohio Court of Appeals, 2003
Palmer v. State, Unpublished Decision (11-20-2001)
Ohio Court of Appeals, 2001
Smith v. Pavicic, Unpublished Decision (3-19-2001)
Ohio Court of Appeals, 2001
Prather v. Brigano
1999 Ohio 212 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1999)