Prater v. Prater

78 S.E. 1008, 140 Ga. 326, 1913 Ga. LEXIS 119
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJuly 18, 1913
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 78 S.E. 1008 (Prater v. Prater) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Prater v. Prater, 78 S.E. 1008, 140 Ga. 326, 1913 Ga. LEXIS 119 (Ga. 1913).

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

The Supreme Court is without jurisdiction to pass upon the merits of any bill of exceptions the recitals of fact in which are not duly certified to be true. Binyard v. State, 126 Ga. 635 (55 S. E. 498) ; Cade v. DuBose, 125 Ga. 832 (54 S. E. 697) ; Grant v. Derrick, 130 Ga. 43 (60 S. E. 157).

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

MacNeill v. Maddox
22 S.E.2d 653 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1942)
Cady v. Cady
131 S.E. 282 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1926)
Rountree v. Gibbs
118 S.E. 654 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1923)
Bugg v. Hughs
107 S.E. 860 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1921)
Houston v. Postell
82 S.E. 148 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
78 S.E. 1008, 140 Ga. 326, 1913 Ga. LEXIS 119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prater-v-prater-ga-1913.