Bugg v. Hughs

107 S.E. 860, 151 Ga. 599, 1921 Ga. LEXIS 344
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJune 16, 1921
DocketNo. 2322
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 107 S.E. 860 (Bugg v. Hughs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bugg v. Hughs, 107 S.E. 860, 151 Ga. 599, 1921 Ga. LEXIS 344 (Ga. 1921).

Opinion

Hill, J.

The certificate of the trial judge to the bill of exceptions in the present case is in substantial accord with the form prescribed in the Civil Code (1910). § 6145, except that the words “is true and” are omitted from the certificate;, and by reason of this omission the recitals of fact contained in the bill of exceptions are not certified as true by the trial judge. The Supreme Court is therefore without jurisdiction to pass upon the merits of the bill of exceptions; and in accordance with the prior rulings of this court the writ of error must be dismissed Grant v. Derrick. 130 Ga. 43 (60 S. E. 157); Prater v. Prater, 140 Ga. 326 (78 S. E. 1008) ; Houston v. Postell. 141 Ga. 792 (82 S. E. 148); Cartledge v. Ashford. 148 Ga. 589 (97 S. E. 521).

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cady v. Cady
131 S.E. 282 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
107 S.E. 860, 151 Ga. 599, 1921 Ga. LEXIS 344, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bugg-v-hughs-ga-1921.