P.R. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

P.R. v. State

460 So. 2d 1, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2531, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16420

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 4, 1984

DocketNo. 83-910

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 460 So. 2d 1 (P.R. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

P.R. v. State, 460 So. 2d 1, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2531, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16420 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was adjudicated delinquent on charges of burglary and second-degree grand theft. We reverse because we conclude that the State’s proof that (1) the juvenile was found sitting in a vehicle parked some 75 to 100 yards from the premises which had been recently burglarized and (2) the locked trunk of the vehicle which was neither owned nor under the control of the juvenile contained property stolen from the burglarized premises is manifestly insufficient to sustain the adjudication. See Davis v. State, 436 So.2d 196 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983), rev. denied, 444 So.2d 418 (Fla.1984); Gains v. State, 417 So.2d 719 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); A.Y.G. v. State, 414 So.2d 1158 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Lockett v. State, 262 So.2d 253 (Fla. 4th DCA 1972).

Reversed with directions to discharge the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was adjudicated delinquent on charges of burglary and second-degree grand theft. We reverse because we conclude that the State’s proof that (1) the juvenile was found sitting in a vehicle parked some 75 to 100 yards from the premises which had been recently burglarized and (2) the locked trunk of the vehicle which was neither owned nor under the control of the juvenile contained property stolen from the burglarized premises is manifestly insufficient to sustain the adjudication. See Davis v. State, 436 So.2d 196 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983), rev. denied, 444 So.2d 418 (Fla.1984); Gains v. State, 417 So.2d 719 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); A.Y.G. v. State, 414 So.2d 1158 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Lockett v. State, 262 So.2d 253 (Fla. 4th DCA 1972).

Reversed with directions to discharge the appellant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

460 So. 2d 1, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2531, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16420, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pr-v-state-fladistctapp-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack