In the Interest of L.R. v. State
559 So. 2d 389, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2450, 1990 WL 40328
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 10, 1990·No. No. 88-1862·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
The state having failed to establish a prima facie case against L.R. and having failed to exclude every reasonable hypothesis of innocence, Jaramillo v. State, 417 So.2d 257 (Fla.1982); J.W. v. State, 467 So.2d 796 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); P.R. v. State, 460 So.2d 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984), we reverse the adjudication of delinquency for grand theft of an automobile and the order of restitution; we remand with directions to discharge appellant.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In the Interest of L.R. v. State, 559 So. 2d 389, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2450, 1990 WL 40328 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).
559 So. 2d 389 (In the Interest of L.R. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
F.D. v. State
927 So. 2d 936 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)