In the Interest of L.R. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

In the Interest of L.R. v. State

559 So. 2d 389, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2450, 1990 WL 40328

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 10, 1990

DocketNo. 88-1862

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 559 So. 2d 389 (In the Interest of L.R. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In the Interest of L.R. v. State, 559 So. 2d 389, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2450, 1990 WL 40328 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The state having failed to establish a prima facie case against L.R. and having failed to exclude every reasonable hypothesis of innocence, Jaramillo v. State, 417 So.2d 257 (Fla.1982); J.W. v. State, 467 So.2d 796 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); P.R. v. State, 460 So.2d 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984), we reverse the adjudication of delinquency for grand theft of an automobile and the order of restitution; we remand with directions to discharge appellant.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The state having failed to establish a prima facie case against L.R. and having failed to exclude every reasonable hypothesis of innocence, Jaramillo v. State, 417 So.2d 257 (Fla.1982); J.W. v. State, 467 So.2d 796 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); P.R. v. State, 460 So.2d 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984), we reverse the adjudication of delinquency for grand theft of an automobile and the order of restitution; we remand with directions to discharge appellant.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

559 So. 2d 389, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2450, 1990 WL 40328, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-lr-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack