Ppm Atlantic Renewable v. Fayette County Zoning Board

41 A.3d 854, 615 Pa. 150, 2012 WL 1109392, 2012 Pa. LEXIS 730
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 4, 2012·No. 360 WAL 2011·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

*151 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 4th day of April, 2012, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by Petitioner are:

(1) Is Appellant required to appeal a Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code bond order even though both the statute and all case law existing at the time of the appeal state that it is not a final order?

(2) Can and should the courts retroactively apply the Takacs [v. Indian Lake Borough, Zoning Hearing Board, 18 A.3d 354 (Pa.Cmwlth.2011) ] rationale?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ppm Atlantic Renewable v. Fayette County Zoning Board, 41 A.3d 854, 615 Pa. 150, 2012 WL 1109392, 2012 Pa. LEXIS 730 (Pa. 2012).

41 A.3d 854 (Ppm Atlantic Renewable v. Fayette County Zoning Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

PPM Atlantic Renewable v. Fayette County Zoning Hearing Board
81 A.3d 896 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2013)
Butler v. POWERS ESTATE
41 A.3d 854 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2012)