Butler v. POWERS ESTATE

41 A.3d 854, 615 Pa. 149, 2012 WL 1087928, 2012 Pa. LEXIS 716
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 3, 2012
Docket760 MAL 2011
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 41 A.3d 854 (Butler v. POWERS ESTATE) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Butler v. POWERS ESTATE, 41 A.3d 854, 615 Pa. 149, 2012 WL 1087928, 2012 Pa. LEXIS 716 (Pa. 2012).

Opinion

*150 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 3rd day of April, 2012, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioners, is:

In interpreting a deed reservation for “minerals,” whether the Superior Court erred in remanding the case for the introduction of scientific and historic evidence about the Marcellus shale and the natural gas contained therein, despite the fact that the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has held (1) a rebuttable presumption exists that parties intend the term “minerals” to include only metallic substances, and (2) only the parties’ intent can rebut the presumption to include non-metallic substances.

The Application for Leave to File Amicus Statement in Support of Petition for Allowance of Appeal, filed by the Pennsylvania Independent Oil & Gas Association, is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Uschock, W. v. Kriebel Gas
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2014
Butler v. Charles Powers Estate ex rel. Warren
65 A.3d 885 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
41 A.3d 854, 615 Pa. 149, 2012 WL 1087928, 2012 Pa. LEXIS 716, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/butler-v-powers-estate-pa-2012.