PPG Industries, Inc. v. CALCARA

Missouri Court of Appeals

PPG Industries, Inc. v. CALCARA

244 S.W.3d 280, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 193, 2008 WL 294888

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 5, 2008·No. WD 68176·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

PPG Industries, Inc. appeals an award by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission determining that Claimant James Calcara sustained a compensable occupational disease and that he timely filed a claim for workers’ compensation benefits. After a thorough review of the record, we find that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value, but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

PPG Industries, Inc. appeals an award by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission determining that Claimant James Calcara sustained a compensable occupational disease and that he timely filed a claim for workers’ compensation benefits. After a thorough review of the record, we find that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value, but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

PPG Industries, Inc. v. CALCARA, 244 S.W.3d 280, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 193, 2008 WL 294888 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

244 S.W.3d 280 (PPG Industries, Inc. v. CALCARA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related