Hilburn v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Hilburn v. State

244 S.W.3d 280, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 184, 2008 WL 294797

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 5, 2008

DocketWD 68047

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 244 S.W.3d 280 (Hilburn v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hilburn v. State, 244 S.W.3d 280, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 184, 2008 WL 294797 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Richard Hilburn appeals from the denial by the Circuit Court of Saline County of his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 24.035. After a thorough review of the record, we find that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law *281 appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value, but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Richard Hilburn appeals from the denial by the Circuit Court of Saline County of his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 24.035. After a thorough review of the record, we find that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law *281 appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value, but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

244 S.W.3d 280, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 184, 2008 WL 294797, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hilburn-v-state-moctapp-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack