Hilburn v. State

244 S.W.3d 280, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 184, 2008 WL 294797
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 5, 2008·No. WD 68047·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Richard Hilburn appeals from the denial by the Circuit Court of Saline County of his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 24.035. After a thorough review of the record, we find that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law *281 appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value, but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hilburn v. State, 244 S.W.3d 280, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 184, 2008 WL 294797 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

244 S.W.3d 280 (Hilburn v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

PPG Industries, Inc. v. CALCARA
244 S.W.3d 280 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)