Poxon v. Poxon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Poxon v. Poxon

279 A.D.2d 514, 718 N.Y.S.2d 885, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 330

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 16, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 279 A.D.2d 514 (Poxon v. Poxon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Poxon v. Poxon, 279 A.D.2d 514, 718 N.Y.S.2d 885, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 330 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by a judgment entered January 12, 1999, the plaintiff former husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Lifson, J.), dated June 23, 1999, as denied that branch of his motion which was, in effect, for a downward modification of his child support obligation.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, the court correctly denied that branch of the plaintiff’s motion which was, in effect, for a downward modification of his child support obligation (see, Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [9] [b]; Matter of Murphy v Rutowicz, 271 AD2d 691; Petzold v Petzold, 259 AD2d 474). Friedmann, J. P., Goldstein, H. Miller and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by a judgment entered January 12, 1999, the plaintiff former husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Lifson, J.), dated June 23, 1999, as denied that branch of his motion which was, in effect, for a downward modification of his child support obligation.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, the court correctly denied that branch of the plaintiff’s motion which was, in effect, for a downward modification of his child support obligation (see, Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [9] [b]; Matter of Murphy v Rutowicz, 271 AD2d 691; Petzold v Petzold, 259 AD2d 474). Friedmann, J. P., Goldstein, H. Miller and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

279 A.D.2d 514, 718 N.Y.S.2d 885, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 330, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/poxon-v-poxon-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack