Murphy v. Rutowicz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Murphy v. Rutowicz

271 A.D.2d 691, 707 N.Y.S.2d 350, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4530

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 24, 2000

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 271 A.D.2d 691 (Murphy v. Rutowicz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Murphy v. Rutowicz, 271 A.D.2d 691, 707 N.Y.S.2d 350, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4530 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a support proceeding, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Trainor, J.), entered May 4, 1999, which denied his objections to an order of the same court, dated November 18, 1998 (Buse, H.E.), denying, without a hearing, his application, inter alia, for downward modification of child support from $250 per week to $170 per week, on the ground that the appellant failed to demonstrate a change in circumstances.

Ordered that the order entered May 4, 1999, is affirmed, with costs.

The appellant failed to establish a change in circumstances sufficient to warrant downward modification of child support (see, Matter of Kotlyar v Burshtein, 268 AD2d 433). The appellant’s remaining contentions are not properly before this Court (see, Werner v Werner, 130 AD2d 754). Santucci, J. P., Altman, Friedmann and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a support proceeding, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Trainor, J.), entered May 4, 1999, which denied his objections to an order of the same court, dated November 18, 1998 (Buse, H.E.), denying, without a hearing, his application, inter alia, for downward modification of child support from $250 per week to $170 per week, on the ground that the appellant failed to demonstrate a change in circumstances.

Ordered that the order entered May 4, 1999, is affirmed, with costs.

The appellant failed to establish a change in circumstances sufficient to warrant downward modification of child support (see, Matter of Kotlyar v Burshtein, 268 AD2d 433). The appellant’s remaining contentions are not properly before this Court (see, Werner v Werner, 130 AD2d 754). Santucci, J. P., Altman, Friedmann and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

271 A.D.2d 691, 707 N.Y.S.2d 350, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4530, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murphy-v-rutowicz-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack