Powers v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.

57 S.W. 1090, 158 Mo. 87, 1900 Mo. LEXIS 60
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedJune 30, 1900
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 57 S.W. 1090 (Powers v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Powers v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co., 57 S.W. 1090, 158 Mo. 87, 1900 Mo. LEXIS 60 (Mo. 1900).

Opinion

MARSHALL, J.

Action for damages to plaintiff’s land caused by an alleged nuisance maintained by defendant on its land.

In 1867 John Tullock owned 'the' northwest quarter of section fifteen, township thirty-five north, range four east, in St. Erancois county, through which tract the St. Erancois river ran. He also owned the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter of section fifteen, which adjoined the first named tract upon the east.

On the 10th of July, 1867, he conveyed by deed to Thomas Allen, for the St. Louis, Iron Mountain and Southern Railway Company, “a right-of-way, one hundred feet wide with right- of increasing the width of the same for necessary slopes and embankments and turnouts and with right of changing water courses and the right of taking a supply of water and of borrowing or wasting earth or stone for the purpose of constructing and operating their said railway over, through and upon” said tracts of land. This deed was [91]*91duly recorded on May 19, 1868. Under this authority the defendant began building the railroad embankment and canal in the fall of 1867, and finished it in the summer of 1868, and the embankment and canal have remained in the same condition ever since. The embankment is a solid dam which intersects a bend in the St. Erancois river, and deflects that river through the canal so as to cut off the bend and cause the river to flow along (practically) the south side of the embankment. The conditions will be easily understood by reference to the following plat, which was made by the county surveyor and used on the trial in the circuit court.

[92]*92

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Campbell v. Anderson
866 S.W.2d 139 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1993)
Schwartz v. Mills
685 S.W.2d 956 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1985)
Rebel v. Big Tarkio Drainage District of Holt City
602 S.W.2d 787 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1980)
Webb v. Union Electric Co. of Missouri
223 S.W.2d 13 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1949)
Webb v. Union Electric Co.
223 S.W.2d 13 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1949)
Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Hadley
1934 OK 336 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1934)
Bollinger v. American Asphalt Roof Corp.
19 S.W.2d 544 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1929)
Kehres v. City of New York
162 A.D. 349 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1914)
Hayes v. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad
162 S.W. 266 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1913)
Gorman v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad
148 S.W. 1009 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1912)
Pickens v. Coal River Boom Co.
65 S.E. 865 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
57 S.W. 1090, 158 Mo. 87, 1900 Mo. LEXIS 60, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/powers-v-st-louis-iron-mountain-southern-railway-co-mo-1900.