Power Brake Equipment Company, an Oregon Corporation v. United States
427 F.2d 163, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9345
Opinion
Appellant, in the exercise of its expertise, followed the over-all judicial philosophy expressed in Campana Corporation v. Harrison, 114 F.2d 400 (7th Cir. 1940) and E. Albrecht & Son, Inc. v. Landy, 114 F.2d 202 (8th Cir. 1940), for a great many years. On the record before us, we decline to distinguish those cases and thus permit appellant to abandon its own interpretation of the statute as applied to the appellee.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Power Brake Equipment Company, an Oregon Corporation v. United States, 427 F.2d 163, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9345 (9th Cir. 1970).
427 F.2d 163 (Power Brake Equipment Company, an Oregon Corporation v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Western Pioneer, Inc. v. United States
709 F.2d 1331 (Ninth Circuit, 1983)
Committee for an Independent P-I v. Hearst Corp.
704 F.2d 467 (Ninth Circuit, 1983)
Committee For An Independent P-I v. The Hearst Corp.
704 F.2d 467 (Ninth Circuit, 1983)
Blackfeet Tribe of Indians v. Groff
729 F.2d 1185 (Ninth Circuit, 1982)