Powell v. Trans-Auto Systems, Inc.
This text of 32 A.D.2d 650 (Powell v. Trans-Auto Systems, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated June 12, 1968, affirmed, without costs. This third motion by plaintiff for summary judgment was properly denied. The practice of making successive motions for summary judgment, each based upon new factual assertions and proofs which were available to the movant from the outset, is to be discouraged (cf. Levitz v. Robbins Music Corp., 17 A D 2d 801). In any event, there are present issues of fact as to plaintiff’s contributory negligence. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Benjamin and Martuseello, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
32 A.D.2d 650, 300 N.Y.S.2d 747, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4034, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/powell-v-trans-auto-systems-inc-nyappdiv-1969.