Abramoff v. Federal Insurance
This text of 48 A.D.2d 676 (Abramoff v. Federal Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action against an insurer, based upon its alleged failure to take reasonable steps to effectuate the settlement of a claim, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated December 3, 1974, which denied its motion for summary judgment. Order affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements. The affidavits submitted in support of the motion could have been submitted at the time of defendant’s first motion for summary judgment. The portions of the deposition of the plaintiff’s testator, included in the affidavit of defendant’s claims manager, presents no truly new factual material. We discourage "successive motions for summary judgment, each based upon new factual assertions and proofs which were available to the movant from the outset” (Powell v Trans-Auto Systems, 32 AD2d 650). Rabin, Acting P. J., Hopkins, Latham, Christ and Shapiro, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
48 A.D.2d 676, 368 N.Y.S.2d 44, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9702, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abramoff-v-federal-insurance-nyappdiv-1975.