Powell v. State
136 S.E. 543, 36 Ga. App. 295, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 28
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Powell v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 35 Ga. App. 245 →
Opinion
The circumstantial evidence upon which the accused was convicted was not sufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of the guilt of the accused, and, therefore, the court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Powell v. State, 136 S.E. 543, 36 Ga. App. 295, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 28 (Ga. Ct. App. 1927).
136 S.E. 543 (Powell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.