Powell v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Powell v. State

132 S.E. 919, 35 Ga. App. 245, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 664

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 14, 1926

Docket17086

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 132 S.E. 919 (Powell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Powell v. State, 132 S.E. 919, 35 Ga. App. 245, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 664 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

1. The only special ground of the motion for a new trial is too indefinite to be considered. “Grounds of a motion for new trial should be complete within themselves.” Daniel v. Schwarzweiss, 144 Ga. 81 (1) (86 S. E. 239).

2. There was some evidence to support the verdict, the trial judge approved it, and, no error of law having been committed on the trial, this court is powerless to interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI