Powell v. State
906 So. 2d 1139, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 9203, 2005 WL 1398504
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Powell v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 929 So. 2d 54 →
Opinion
Affirmed. See Sampson v. State, 798 So.2d 824, 826 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)(finding that the issue of a general notice of enhancement was not preserved for appellate review because the defendant did not argue that the notice was deficient); Cook v. State, 816 So.2d 773, 774 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002)(stating that “[t]he proper vehicle to challenge the State’s alleged failure to properly seek habitual felony offender sentencing is a motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Powell v. State, 906 So. 2d 1139, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 9203, 2005 WL 1398504 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).
906 So. 2d 1139 (Powell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sampson v. State
798 So. 2d 824 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Cook v. State
816 So. 2d 773 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)