Powell v. Grimes

8 Ind. 252
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided December 1, 1856·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Suit upon a note. Defenses, fraud, want and failure of consideration. Trial. Yerdict for plaintiff. Newtrial granted. Yerdict andjudgmentfor defendants. Instructions given on second trial were not excepted to. The case is here upon an alleged error in granting a new trial, and upon the weight of evidence on the second trial.

This Court would very reluctantly set aside the granting of a new trial. Perhaps a case might occur in which it would do it; but where the Court below conducting .the trial, is not satisfied with its fairness, we [253] should be slow to differ with it. "We cannot in this case.' ■

A. Brower, for the plaintiff. ¿T. Sullivan, for the defendants.

On the weight of evidence, the judgment on the second trial must be affirmed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Powell v. Grimes, 8 Ind. 252 (Ind. 1856).

8 Ind. 252 (Powell v. Grimes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wildwood Manor, Inc. v. Gary National Bank
255 N.E.2d 128 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1970)
White v. Bardach
241 N.E.2d 866 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1968)
Bailey v. Kain
192 N.E.2d 486 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1963)
Wayne Sewer & Drain Co. v. Ward-Cowan Construction Co.
143 N.E. 290 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1924)
Barner v. Bayless
33 N.E. 907 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1893)
Leary v. Ebert
72 Ind. 418 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1880)
Ruble v. McDonald
7 Iowa 90 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1858)