Potter v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Potter v. State

710 So. 2d 754, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 5949, 1998 WL 264003

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 27, 1998

DocketNo. 97-1259

StatusPublished

This text of 710 So. 2d 754 (Potter v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Potter v. State, 710 So. 2d 754, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 5949, 1998 WL 264003 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The state acknowledges that the written adjudication erroneously reflects that Appellant was found guilty as to count I. The trial court, recognizing that it could not sentence Appellant on both count I and count II, orally adjudicated him guilty only with regard to counts II, III, and IV. We recognize that the court did not sentence Appellant as to count I; nevertheless, we reverse and remand so that the trial court may vacate the adjudication as to count I. In all other respects, the judgment and sentence are affirmed.

STONE, C.J., and FARMER and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The state acknowledges that the written adjudication erroneously reflects that Appellant was found guilty as to count I. The trial court, recognizing that it could not sentence Appellant on both count I and count II, orally adjudicated him guilty only with regard to counts II, III, and IV. We recognize that the court did not sentence Appellant as to count I; nevertheless, we reverse and remand so that the trial court may vacate the adjudication as to count I. In all other respects, the judgment and sentence are affirmed.

STONE, C.J., and FARMER and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

710 So. 2d 754, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 5949, 1998 WL 264003, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/potter-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.