Potter v. State

679 So. 2d 816, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8665, 1996 WL 457228
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 14, 1996·No. No. 95-2059·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

SHAHOOD, Judge.

We affirm appellant’s conviction finding no error in any of the issues raised on appeal, including the issue of the unauthorized verdict form in the jury room. See Hatcher v. State, 679 So.2d 27 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).

STONE and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Potter v. State, 679 So. 2d 816, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8665, 1996 WL 457228 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

679 So. 2d 816 (Potter v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tolbert v. State
679 So. 2d 816 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)