Potter v. State

679 So. 2d 816, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8665, 1996 WL 457228
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 14, 1996
DocketNo. 95-2059
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 679 So. 2d 816 (Potter v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Potter v. State, 679 So. 2d 816, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8665, 1996 WL 457228 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

SHAHOOD, Judge.

We affirm appellant’s conviction finding no error in any of the issues raised on appeal, including the issue of the unauthorized verdict form in the jury room. See Hatcher v. State, 679 So.2d 27 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).

STONE and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tolbert v. State
679 So. 2d 816 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
679 So. 2d 816, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8665, 1996 WL 457228, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/potter-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.