Potter v. Mayo

308 U.S. 608, 60 S. Ct. 170, 84 L. Ed. 509, 1939 U.S. LEXIS 112
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 13, 1939·No. No. 128·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida, and [609]*609motion for leave to proceed further in forma pauperis, denied.

Ed. Potter, pro se. Mr. George Couper Gibbs, Attorney General of Florida, for respondents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Potter v. Mayo, 308 U.S. 608, 60 S. Ct. 170, 84 L. Ed. 509, 1939 U.S. LEXIS 112 (1939).

308 U.S. 608 (Potter v. Mayo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ansul Company v. Uniroyal, Inc.
306 F. Supp. 541 (S.D. New York, 1969)
E. I. duPont de Nemours & Co. v. Celanese Corp.
285 F. Supp. 819 (S.D. New York, 1968)
Bissell Inc. v. ER Wagner Manufacturing Company
204 F. Supp. 801 (E.D. Wisconsin, 1962)
Roberts Tobacco Co. v. Department of Revenue
34 N.W.2d 54 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1948)
American Lecithin Co. v. Warfield Co.
42 F. Supp. 270 (N.D. Illinois, 1941)