Possehl v. Employment Division

541 P.2d 1062, 23 Or. App. 189, 1975 Ore. App. LEXIS 924
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided October 28, 1975·No. No. 75-AB-405, CA 4716·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

SCHWAB, C. J.

Claimant seeks unemployment benefits for certain [190]*190weeks during which he was enrolled in a college course which required attendance in class from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. on Tuesdays and Thursdays.

The referee held against the claimant on the ground that he was not sufficiently available for work within the meaning of ORS 657.155(1) (c) which reads in pertinent part:

“He is able to work, is available for work, and is actively seeking and unable to obtain suitable work * *

The Employment Appeals Board affirmed the referee as do we. Evjen v. Employment Division, 22 Or App 372, 539 P2d 662 (1975), and Brown v. Employment Division, 22 Or App 382, 539 P2d 666 (1975), are dispositive of this case.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Possehl v. Employment Division, 541 P.2d 1062, 23 Or. App. 189, 1975 Ore. App. LEXIS 924 (Or. Ct. App. 1975).

541 P.2d 1062 (Possehl v. Employment Division) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wardell v. Employment Division
541 P.2d 1063 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1975)