Possehl v. Employment Division
This text of 541 P.2d 1062 (Possehl v. Employment Division) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Claimant seeks unemployment benefits for certain [190]*190weeks during which he was enrolled in a college course which required attendance in class from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. on Tuesdays and Thursdays.
The referee held against the claimant on the ground that he was not sufficiently available for work within the meaning of ORS 657.155(1) (c) which reads in pertinent part:
“He is able to work, is available for work, and is actively seeking and unable to obtain suitable work * *
The Employment Appeals Board affirmed the referee as do we. Evjen v. Employment Division, 22 Or App 372, 539 P2d 662 (1975), and Brown v. Employment Division, 22 Or App 382, 539 P2d 666 (1975), are dispositive of this case.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
541 P.2d 1062, 23 Or. App. 189, 1975 Ore. App. LEXIS 924, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/possehl-v-employment-division-orctapp-1975.