Posner v. Posner

93 So. 2d 398, 1957 Fla. LEXIS 3743
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMarch 6, 1957
StatusPublished

This text of 93 So. 2d 398 (Posner v. Posner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Posner v. Posner, 93 So. 2d 398, 1957 Fla. LEXIS 3743 (Fla. 1957).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on authority of Meloche v. Meloche, 101 Fla. 659, 133 So. 339, 140 So. 319, and Randall v. Randall, 158 Fla. 502, 29 So. 2d 238, but without prejudice to appellant to apply to the Chancellor to require security for the payment of maintenance for the minor children if a proper showing can be made under Section 65.14, Florida Statutes, F.S.A.

Upon remand of the cause, either party is authorized to apply to the Chancellor to make such modification as to the manner and method of accomplishing a division of the corporate stock held by them in the light of our opinion in Schnitzer v. Schnitzer, Fla.1949, 40 So.2d 450.

Affirmed.

TERRELL, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW and THORNAL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schnitzer v. Schnitzer
40 So. 2d 450 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1949)
Randall v. Randall
29 So. 2d 238 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1947)
Meloche v. Meloche
133 So. 339 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
93 So. 2d 398, 1957 Fla. LEXIS 3743, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/posner-v-posner-fla-1957.