Posner v. Posner

93 So. 2d 398, 1957 Fla. LEXIS 3743
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided March 6, 1957·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on authority of Meloche v. Meloche, 101 Fla. 659, 133 So. 339, 140 So. 319, and Randall v. Randall, 158 Fla. 502, 29 So. 2d 238, but without prejudice to appellant to apply to the Chancellor to require security for the payment of maintenance for the minor children if a proper showing can be made under Section 65.14, Florida Statutes, F.S.A.

Upon remand of the cause, either party is authorized to apply to the Chancellor to make such modification as to the manner and method of accomplishing a division of the corporate stock held by them in the light of our opinion in Schnitzer v. Schnitzer, Fla.1949, 40 So.2d 450.

Affirmed.

TERRELL, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW and THORNAL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Posner v. Posner, 93 So. 2d 398, 1957 Fla. LEXIS 3743 (Fla. 1957).

93 So. 2d 398 (Posner v. Posner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Schnitzer v. Schnitzer
40 So. 2d 450 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1949)
Randall v. Randall
29 So. 2d 238 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1947)
Meloche v. Meloche
133 So. 339 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1931)