Posner v. Posner
This text of 93 So. 2d 398 (Posner v. Posner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed on authority of Meloche v. Meloche, 101 Fla. 659, 133 So. 339, 140 So. 319, and Randall v. Randall, 158 Fla. 502, 29 So. 2d 238, but without prejudice to appellant to apply to the Chancellor to require security for the payment of maintenance for the minor children if a proper showing can be made under Section 65.14, Florida Statutes, F.S.A.
Upon remand of the cause, either party is authorized to apply to the Chancellor to make such modification as to the manner and method of accomplishing a division of the corporate stock held by them in the light of our opinion in Schnitzer v. Schnitzer, Fla.1949, 40 So.2d 450.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
93 So. 2d 398, 1957 Fla. LEXIS 3743, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/posner-v-posner-fla-1957.