Meloche v. Meloche

133 So. 339, 101 Fla. 659
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided February 4, 1931·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of *660 its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P.J., and Terrell and Buford, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Meloche v. Meloche, 133 So. 339, 101 Fla. 659 (Fla. 1931).

133 So. 339 (Meloche v. Meloche) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Burns v. Burns
174 So. 2d 432 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)
Aldrich v. Aldrich
163 So. 2d 276 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1964)
Posner v. Posner
93 So. 2d 398 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1957)
Sherrer v. Sherrer
334 U.S. 343 (Supreme Court, 1948)
Tenny v. Tenny
3 So. 2d 375 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1941)
Francis v. Francis
182 So. 833 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1938)
Thomas v. Thompson
155 So. 321 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1934)
Ammer v. Ammer
151 So. 711 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1933)
Yates, as Trustee v. Pen. Securities Corp.
144 So. 664 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1932)