Posey v. State

356 S.W.3d 836, 2012 WL 43112, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 10
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 10, 2012
DocketWD 73145
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 356 S.W.3d 836 (Posey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Posey v. State, 356 S.W.3d 836, 2012 WL 43112, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 10 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM:

Deshaun Posey appeals from the Judgment entered by the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri (“motion court”), denying Posey’s Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Posey argues that the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion because he claims his plea counsel provided ineffective assistance in the advice provided to Posey leading to his guilty plea. We disagree and affirm in this per curiam order. We have provided the parties a legal memorandum explaining our ruling. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jones v. State
356 S.W.3d 836 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
356 S.W.3d 836, 2012 WL 43112, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 10, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/posey-v-state-moctapp-2012.